The average search account leaks 15-30% of spend on irrelevant clicks while targeting only 15-20% of its addressable market. The Six-Phase Campaign Architecture fixes both — built from 90+ search accounts and 160+ total accounts managed. One DTC brand used this exact system to scale from $21K to $336K/month at 3.8x true ROAS on non-brand search alone.
Level up with these complementary products.
These pair well with what you're looking at.
0+
0%
$0K/mo
84% of advertisers use fewer than 50 negative keywords. The median brand targets 15-20% of its addressable market. 90% of RSAs are generic headline soup where every ad could belong to a competitor. These aren't three problems. They're symptoms of one root cause: no architecture underneath the campaigns.
One DTC brand was stuck at $21K/month — single PMax, no match-type separation, no negatives. Their reported "4.2x ROAS" was inflated by branded traffic converting at 12x while prospecting search barely broke even. After rebuilding: $336K/month, with non-brand search at 3.8x true ROAS. The difference wasn't budget. It was architecture.
— Single-theme ad groups organized by intent, not catalog. Four Pocket Architecture separates Branded Search, Prospecting Search, Branded Shopping, Prospecting PMax. Quality scores climb from 5-6 to 8-10.
— Run the 21-query keyword protocol to discover 1,300-2,500 keywords. Map across 7 intent layers. Generate 380-620 angles with BOFU/MOFU/TOFU classification.
— 25 RSA headline candidates per ad group, scored on a 100-point rubric. Three RSAs per cluster with distinct personalities (Authority, Transformation, Value). Median lift: 1.8x → 3.4x ROAS.
— Build negative architecture to 200+ terms using the 3-list shared set system. Accounts with 200+ negatives see 67% lower CPA. Add placement exclusions — recovers 10-35% of budget on Day 1.
— Run the 17-phase Competitor Decode to reverse-engineer competitor messaging, detect A/B tests, score Blue Ocean opportunities, build counter-positioning. One client captured $22K/month from competitor traffic.
— Budget pacing, hourly bid adjustments, extensions, and the 30-minute Monday review that compounds results every week.
One product. Two ways to implement. Choose the depth that matches your timeline.
Full curriculum and architecture — build the system yourself
What you get
Not included
Everything in Blueprint + downloadable agent codebase
What you get
Lifetime access. Free updates. Upgrade to a higher tier anytime — pay only the difference.
You invest
$997 once.
At $10K/month search spend:
Placement exclusions + 50 negatives save $2,000-4,000/month. Full negative architecture + RSA rebuild saves $5,000-10,000/month. Audience expansion opens $5,000-15,000/month in new revenue.
At $25K/month:
Negative architecture alone recovers $3,750-7,500/month (15-30% waste). Competitive counter-positioning adds $5,000-22,000/month from competitor capture.
At $50K/month:
Full Six-Phase implementation recovers $15,000-25,000/month in waste + new revenue. Competitive campaigns add $10,000-22,000/month from Blue Ocean territory.
Break-even:
$33/day. Most accounts find that in the first hour of the negative keyword audit.
Your campaigns already have the traffic and the budget. The only thing missing is the architecture that turns spend into system.
Most Shopping improvements are accidental. This system makes every improvement deliberate. 19 modules spanning feed architecture → AI Mode readiness → PMax multi-campaign orchestration — built from $120M+ in managed Shopping spend and $60M+ in PMax spend across 160+ accounts. One 600-product feed rewrite took CPCs from $3 to $0.80. One PMax architecture change lifted ROAS from 1.8x to 3.4x.
Built from 90+ search accounts across 160+ total accounts. Every framework extracted from real campaign data.
| Metric | Before (median) | After 60 days (median) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search ROAS | 1.8x | 3.1x | +72% |
| CTR on Search ads | 2.4% | 3.6% | +50% |
| Quality Score (weighted avg) | 4.8 | 7.1 | +48% |
| CPC on core keywords | $2.85 | $2.12 | -26% |
| Metric | Before (median) | After 60 days (median) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keywords targeted | 165 | 1,450+ | +779% |
| Addressable market coverage | 18% | 72% | +300% |
| CPA on newly discovered segments | baseline | -22% vs existing | -22% |
| Metric | Before (median) | After 60 days (median) |
|---|---|---|
| Blue Ocean angles identified | 0 | 6 per market |
| ROAS after repositioning | 2.1x | 3.4x |
| CPA on counter-positioned campaigns | baseline | -28% vs standard |
Last updated today · 3 updates since launch
View all updates →