Your platform says 5x ROAS. But how much of that spend is creating revenue that wouldn't exist without it?
This checklist walks you through designing your first incrementality test - from choosing the right test type to reading the results. Based on audits across 20+ e-commerce brands and data from 322 published incrementality studies.
Use it before you spend another month making budget decisions on numbers you can't verify.
Before you design a test, make sure you have the prerequisites.
Best for: First-time testers. Answers "is brand search incremental?" in 7-10 days.
Decision thresholds:
Best for: Brands with 250+ weekly conversions wanting high-confidence answers.
Every item here can invalidate your test results.
Incremental Revenue:
Treatment market revenue: $_______ Control market revenue (raw): $_______ Control market population share: % Expected control revenue at treatment scale: Control revenue x (Treatment share / Control share) = $ Incremental revenue: Treatment revenue - Expected control revenue = $_______
Incremental ROAS (iROAS):
iROAS = Incremental Revenue / Test Ad Spend = _______x
Platform ROAS (for comparison):
Platform ROAS = Platform-Reported Revenue / Ad Spend = _______x
Incrementality Factor:
Factor = iROAS / Platform ROAS = _______
This is the calibration number you apply to ongoing reporting.
Pre-committing to decisions prevents reinterpretation of uncomfortable results.
If lift is below _____%, we will: ________________________________
If lift is between _____% and _____%, we will: ________________________________
If lift is above _____%, we will: ________________________________
If results are inconclusive, we will: ________________________________
When you can't run a formal test, apply these conservative multipliers to platform ROAS:
| Account Type | Multiplier | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy brand search (>15% of spend) | 0.50x | 6.0x ROAS becomes 3.0x |
| Mixed campaigns (standard e-commerce) | 0.70x | 5.0x ROAS becomes 3.5x |
| Primarily non-brand Shopping | 0.85x | 4.0x ROAS becomes 3.4x |
| Non-brand Shopping only | 0.90x | 3.5x ROAS becomes 3.2x |
These are conservative estimates based on published test data. Your actual factor will differ. Run the test to find your number.
| Quarter | Test | Why This Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Brand search incrementality | Lowest competition. Set baseline for the year. |
| Q2 | PMax incrementality (3-cell) | With brand / without brand / holdout. |
| Q3 | Channel comparison (Shopping vs Search) | Results inform Q4 budgets. |
| Q4 | Monitor only | Don't test during peak. Apply existing factors. |
Refresh triggers (run a new test when any of these occur):
This checklist gives you the test design framework. The Google Ads AI Agentic System ($4,997+) includes:
The system is built for e-commerce brands spending $10K-$100K/month who want to stop making six-figure budget decisions on data they can't trust.