CloBombs
One odor problem per campaign: cats, dogs, cars and smoke.
1,737purchases from our Meta campaigns · March to June 2026
CloBombs sells odor kits for homes and cars. From March to June 2026 we ran Meta campaigns for four of those problems, each with its own ads. The campaigns that carry our tag spent $94,558, and Meta attributed 1,737 purchases to them at a 1.44× return.
1,737CloBombs
Talk about an account like thisOur Meta campaigns.
1,241 ads in 18 campaigns that carry our tag, from Mar 22, 2026 to Jun 29, 2026. The same account also holds campaigns run by the brand or another team. They are left out of every figure here; the last column of the monthly table shows how much of the account’s spend ours were.
- Ad spend in our campaigns
- $94,5581,241 ads in 18 campaigns · Mar 22, 2026 to Jun 29, 2026
- Purchases
- 1,737As Meta attributed them · $54.44 each
- Purchase value
- $136,608The order value Meta recorded for those purchases
- Purchase value / spend
- 1.44×Largest full month: May 2026, $44,582 spent at 1.42×
Every month of our campaigns.
Purchase value beside ad spend for each month, in USD. A month that lists days covers only those days.
Scroll sideways to see every period.
0–65,000 · USD per month · common zero baseline. All periods share this scale.
Read the values
| Period | Purchase value | Ad spend |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | $1,240 | $1,314 |
| Apr 2026 | $55,027 | $35,657 |
| May 2026 | $63,290 | $44,582 |
| Jun 2026 | $17,051 | $13,005 |
Source: Tegra’s Meta performance database, read November 11, 2026. Period totals as Meta reported them.
| Month | Ads running | Ad spend | Purchases | Purchase value | Value / spend | Cost per purchase | Share of account spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 2026 | 62 | $1,314 | 14 | $1,240 | 0.94× | $93.89 | 1% |
Apr 2026 | 207 | $35,657 | 643 | $55,027 | 1.54× | $55.45 | 29% |
May 2026 | 524 | $44,582 | 862 | $63,290 | 1.42× | $51.72 | 17% |
Jun 2026 | 725 | $13,005 | 218 | $17,051 | 1.31× | $59.66 | 7% |
Where the spend went.
Our campaigns grouped by what their name states. Each row shows its ad spend, with purchases and return beside it. Groups under 0.5% of the spend are left out.
0–50,000 · USD ad spend · Mar to Jun 2026 · common zero baseline
Source: Tegra’s Meta performance database, read November 11, 2026. Period totals as Meta reported them.
The ads that carried the most spend.
The highest-spend ads in our campaigns that we can name from our own production files. An ad that ran in several ad sets is added up into one row. High spend shows where the budget went; it is not a win rate.
| Ad | Format | Ad spend | Purchases | Value / spend | Ran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Video V024Hook 6, lead 1, body 1 · captioned cut | Video | $10,501 | 245 | 1.41× | Apr 20, 2026 to Jun 1, 2026 |
X-ray carpetImage 0089 · angle A20 | Image | $10,012 | 188 | 1.88× | Mar 31, 2026 to May 31, 2026 |
Video V040Hook 4, lead 1, body 1 · captioned cut | Video | $9,082 | 173 | 1.63× | Apr 22, 2026 to Jun 27, 2026 |
Video V045Hook 9, lead 1, body 1 · captioned cut | Video | $9,042 | 169 | 1.72× | Apr 22, 2026 to Jun 15, 2026 |
Video V026Hook 8, lead 1, body 1 · captioned cut | Video | $4,823 | 105 | 1.26× | Apr 20, 2026 to May 28, 2026 |
Video V057Hook 3, lead 1, body 1 · captioned cut | Video | $3,773 | 80 | 1.30× | Apr 20, 2026 to May 28, 2026 |
How to read this record
These are the campaigns in the CloBombs ad account whose name carries Tegra’s tag, or whose ads appear in a launch receipt saved by our launch system. The same account also holds campaigns run by the brand or another team. They are left out of every figure here; the last column of the monthly table shows how much of the account’s spend ours were.
- Figures are what Meta reported, in each ad set’s own attribution setting. Purchase value is the order value Meta recorded, before cost of goods. It is not profit, store revenue or incremental lift.
- Meta and other channels can credit the same order, so these figures are not added to Google or store totals.
- Work launched into campaigns without the tag is not counted, so the record can understate what we ran.
- The whole account, Jan 1, 2026 to Jul 7, 2026: $794,099 spent, 15,733 purchases, 2,036 ads in 28 campaigns. Our campaigns were 12% of that spend.
Source: Tegra’s Meta performance database, read November 11, 2026. Period totals as Meta reported them.
What we did.
The main pieces of work on this account.
Split the account by the smell being solved
Separate campaigns for cat odor, dog odor, vehicle odor and car smoke, 18 in all, so each problem could be bought and read on its own.
Send each problem to its own page
The cat ads led to a cat-odor page and the car-smoke ads to a smoke-eliminator page, not to one general store page.
Hold the cost with bid caps
Most campaigns ran on bid caps. One cost-cap campaign tested the cat line in April.
Keep new ads coming
1,241 ads over four months. Fifteen of the 20 highest-spend ads were videos.
How the work fits together.
- Problem
Each campaign answers one smell: cat, dog, vehicle or smoke.
- Ads
Short videos and images made for that problem.
- Page
The click lands on a page about the same problem.
- Monthly record
Spend, purchases and return are read per problem.
Review the results before the next round of work.
Cat odor returned 1.65× on $47,109, the best of the four lines. Vehicle odor did not pay back at 0.91×. Splitting the account by problem is what made that visible.
How this was measured.
Tegra’s Meta performance database, read November 11, 2026. Period totals only; no account identifiers are published.
| Question | Source scope |
|---|---|
Which period? | March 22–June 29, 2026 |
What is measured? | Meta-reported spend, purchases and purchase value for the campaigns that carry Tegra’s tag, in US dollars. Purchase value is Meta’s attribution, before cost of goods. |
What kind of record? | Meta account report |
What engagement? | Past managed campaigns |
Sources and limits
- Purchase value is Meta’s attribution, before cost of goods. It is not profit, store revenue or incremental lift.
- Only campaigns that carry our tag are counted. They were 12% of the account’s spend in the period; the rest was run by other teams and is not our result.
- This is past work that ended in June 2026. It does not describe what is running today.
- Four months is a short record and not a forecast.
Want this kind of work
on your account?
Have our team run it for you, or license the system and run it in-house.